<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment on &#8216;Walking the Cyberbeat&#8217; by Newsweek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://recogmission.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/short-comment-on-walking-the-cyberbeat-by-newsweek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://recogmission.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/short-comment-on-walking-the-cyberbeat-by-newsweek/</link>
	<description>New image search engine Picollator.com and corporate info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 05:54:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: recogmission</title>
		<link>http://recogmission.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/short-comment-on-walking-the-cyberbeat-by-newsweek/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>recogmission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 05:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recogmission.wordpress.com/?p=84#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Of course, it depends on the size. If you have the small website with less than 200 uploads per day, you may use manual moderation. At the same time, if you have a website with, e.g., 2000 uploads per day, then you can probably have a typical issue. You cannot afford payouts to the special employee to check the content, but you have to perform moderation. In that case the automatic procedure looks attractive. Because we offer the service in a manner of SaaS model, you pay only for its usage. So you may first try, then estimate your actual needs and make a decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it depends on the size. If you have the small website with less than 200 uploads per day, you may use manual moderation. At the same time, if you have a website with, e.g., 2000 uploads per day, then you can probably have a typical issue. You cannot afford payouts to the special employee to check the content, but you have to perform moderation. In that case the automatic procedure looks attractive. Because we offer the service in a manner of SaaS model, you pay only for its usage. So you may first try, then estimate your actual needs and make a decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaina</title>
		<link>http://recogmission.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/short-comment-on-walking-the-cyberbeat-by-newsweek/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 05:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recogmission.wordpress.com/?p=84#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Alexander, this estimation is very interesting, however, you consider the biggest companies. What can you say about small business, for instance, photo hosting service?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexander, this estimation is very interesting, however, you consider the biggest companies. What can you say about small business, for instance, photo hosting service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
